Toxic vs. non-toxic
That is the big difference between conventional and alternative cancer treatments. Unequivocally, all conventional cancer treatments are toxic, and all successful alternative treatments are completely non-toxic.
Do you remember the case of Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther King’s widow, who died after trying an alternative cancer treatment clinic in Mexico? The press lambasted alternative clinics because she died after seeking treatment in Mexico. I’m sure that’s all you heard, as I did. What they failed to mention was that conventional medicine had written her off as incurable, and sent her home to die. By the time she went to Mexico, it was just too late.
It’s a fact of life that most of the time, people have already been cut, poisoned or burned extensively by the time they turn to the alternative treatment.
If you’re facing a fight with cancer, believe that alternative treatments work—without all the miserable side effects. The Big 3 treatment is NOT the answer. But your doctor, as he/she was taught in med school, will tell you otherwise.
The establishment cancer industry has no interest in anything that doesn’t make them money. And the Big 3 treatments generate LOTS of money for them. Successful clinicians in alternative cancer treatments have been pilloried and persecuted—big time. And the USA is the worse of the bunch in the persecution bandwagon, with other countries following their lead.
They claim that there’s “no official scientific evidence” for successful alternative cancer treatments. Funny thing—in order for something to be deemed “official scientific evidence”, it HAS to be submitted to the FDA by the pharmaceutical industry. And they aren’t interested in anything they can’t make money on. So, all the very successful alternative treatments are either completely ignored, or persecuted.
Word gets out, in spite of their efforts. But they still try to pillory anything alternative, no matter how much it is praised.
- People’s testimonies are explained as “unreliable” or “anecdotal”
- The treatments are totally ignored or suppressed
- Any successes are explained as “spontaneous remission” not related to the alternative treatments.
- They say that the patients were actually cured from delayed effects of their conventional treatments administered before the alternative treatments.
Just know, if you hear these explanations, you can take it for what it’s worth. They lie with impunity!
The best of over three hundred non-toxic alternative cancer treatments
Alternative physicians think of cancer as a disease that affects the whole body. And they treat the whole body to correct the actual cause of the disease, not just the tumor.
Ty Bollinger has studied all three hundred of these non-toxic treatments, and chosen the best and most successful of the bunch. Are they perfect? Of course not, and they don’t come with any guarantees. Cancer is evil and unpredictable, but it can be beaten with the right treatment.
Next post, we look at the actual treatments.